Caretaker notice. Before an election, the Australian Government assumes a caretaker role. Limited updates will be made to this site in line with the Guidance on Caretaker Conventions.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18526
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTulloch, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorHing, Nerilee-
dc.contributor.authorBrowne, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorRockloff, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorHilbrecht, Margo-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-22T03:13:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-22T03:13:58Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-16-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/18526-
dc.description.abstractExcessive time and money spent on gambling can result in harms, not only to people experiencing a gambling problem but also to their close family and friends ("concerned significant others"; CSOs). The current study aimed to explore whether, and to what extent, CSOs experience decrements to their wellbeing due to another person's gambling. We analysed data from The Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (HILDA; N = 19,064) and the Canadian Quinte Longitudinal Study (QLS; N = 3,904). Participants either self-identified as CSOs (QLS) or were identified by living in a household with a person classified in the problem gambling category by the PGSI (HILDA). Subjective well-being was measured using the Personal Wellbeing Index and single-item questions on happiness and satisfaction with life. CSOs reported lower subjective wellbeing than non-CSOs across both countries and on all three wellbeing measures. CSO status remained a significant predictor of lower wellbeing after controlling for demographic and socio-economic factors, and own-gambling problems. There were no significant differences across various relationships to the gambler, by gender, or between household and non-household CSOs. Gambling-related harms experienced by CSOs was reliably associated with a decrease in wellbeing. This decrement to CSO's wellbeing was not as strong as that experienced by the person with the first-order gambling problem. Nevertheless, wellbeing decrements to CSOs are not limited to those living with a person with gambling problems in the household and thus affect many people.en
dc.language.isoen-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of behavioral addictions-
dc.titleThe effect of gambling problems on the subjective wellbeing of gamblers' family and friends: Evidence from large-scale population research in Australia and Canadaen
dc.typeJournal Articlesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1556/2006.2021.00077en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://akjournals.com/view/journals/2006/10/4/article-p941.xmlen
local.subject.policyTheses and student dissertationsen
dc.identifier.surveyHILDAen
dc.description.keywordsproblem gamblingen
dc.description.keywordsconcerned significant othersen
dc.description.keywordsgambling harmsen
dc.description.keywordssubjective wellbeingen
dc.description.keywordsHILDAen
dc.description.keywordsQuinte Longitudinal Studyen
dc.description.pages941–952en
dc.title.bookJournal of Behavioral Addictionsen
dc.subject.dssHealth and wellbeingen
dc.relation.surveyHILDAen
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Articles-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

248
checked on May 12, 2025

Download(s)

68
checked on May 12, 2025
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.