Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Longitudinal Study: HILDA
Title: Mental health and productivity at work: does what you do matter?
Authors: Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. 
Bubonya, Melisa 
Wooden, Mark 
Publication Date: Jun-2017
Pages: 150-165
Keywords: Mental health
Abstract: Much of the economic cost of mental illness stems from workers’ reduced productivity. Using nationally representative panel data we analyze the links between mental health and two alternative workplace productivity measures – absenteeism and presenteeism (i.e., lower productivity while attending work) – explicitly allowing these relationships to be moderated by the nature of the job itself. We find that absence rates are approximately five percent higher among workers who report being in poor mental health. Moreover, job conditions are related to both presenteeism and absenteeism even after accounting for workers’ self-reported mental health status. Job conditions are relatively more important in understanding diminished productivity at work if workers are in good rather than poor mental health. The effects of job complexity and stress on absenteeism do not depend on workers’ mental health, while job security and control moderate the effect of mental illness on absence days.
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2017.05.001
Research collection: Journal Articles
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Feb 29, 2024
Google icon

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.