Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18356
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, Janeen-
dc.contributor.authorPerales, F-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-13T03:43:24Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-02T23:22:20Zen
dc.date.available2019-01-02T23:22:20Zen
dc.date.issued2017-12-07-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/18356en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10620/4467en
dc.description.abstractObjective. To investigate the quality of intimate relationships of bisexual, gay, lesbian, and heterosexual individuals in Australia and the United Kingdom. Background. There is a shortage of research on the relationship quality of nonheterosexual individuals, and the majority of the available evidence comes from the United States. We add to existing knowledge by considering bisexual individuals; examining mixed‐orientation couples; and using recent, large, and nationally representative cross‐national data. Method. Data from 25,348 individuals in the United Kingdom (Understanding Society study) and 9,206 individuals in Australia (Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey) were used to estimate regression models predicting relationship quality while adjusting for confounds. Results. Relationship quality in same‐sex couples was as high as in heterosexual couples in the United Kingdom, and higher in Australia. The lowest relationship quality in both countries was reported by bisexual individuals. Conclusion. Our results provide robust evidence to combat deep‐rooted and erroneous social perceptions of same‐sex relationships being conflictual, unhappy, and dysfunctional. Implications. Our findings support policies that seek to legalize same‐sex marriage and parenting rights. They also highlight the need to give further attention to bisexual individuals as a distinct group because their outcomes are comparatively poor.en
dc.subjectGenderen
dc.subjectRelationshipsen
dc.subjectBeliefs and Valuesen
dc.titleSexual Identity and Relationship Quality in Australia and the United Kingdomen
dc.typeJournal Articlesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/fare.12293en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/fare.12293en
dc.identifier.surveyHILDAen
dc.identifier.journalFamily Relationsen
dc.identifier.volume67en
dc.description.pages55-69en
dc.identifier.issue1en
local.identifier.id5045en
dc.title.bookFamily Relationsen
dc.subject.dssFamilies and relationshipsen
dc.subject.dssGenderen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryRelationshipsen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryGenderen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryBeliefs and Valuesen
dc.subject.flosseGenderen
dc.subject.flosseFamilies and relationshipsen
dc.relation.surveyHILDAen
dc.old.surveyvalueHILDAen
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Articles-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

58
checked on Jun 8, 2023
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.