Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Ha Trong-
dc.contributor.authorConnelly, Luke-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-13T03:43:22Zen
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-08T00:28:22Zen
dc.date.available2018-06-08T00:28:22Zen
dc.date.issued2014-01-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/18353en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10620/4434en
dc.description.abstractIt is well acknowledged that the intensity of caregiving affects the labour force participation of caregivers. The literature so far has not, however, been able to control effectively for the endogeneity of caregiving intensity. This paper contributes by dealing with the endogeneity of unpaid caregiving intensity when examining its impact on the labour force participation of caregivers. We distinguish between care provided to people who cohabit with the care recipient and care provided to recipients who reside elsewhere, as well as between primary and secondary caring roles. We address the endogeneity of selection in various care intensity roles via an instrumental variables approach, using the health status of potential care recipients as instruments. Data from wave 8 of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey which was undertaken in 2008 are used. We focus on a sample of 7845 working age males and females. Ruling out the endogeneity of any caregiving intensity role, we find that caregiving has a significant deterrent effect on caregivers' employment. This deterrent effect however is concentrated among those who identify as the main caregiver and the result appears to be the same irrespective of gender. Providing care as the main caregiver reduces the probability of employment by approximately 12 percentage points for both males and females, regardless of whether or not the caregivers cohabit with the care recipients. By contrast, we find no statistically significant impact of providing care as a secondary caregiver on the employment probabilities of either males or females. These results are germane to the development of policies that may affect informal caregiving and, thereby, the labour force decisions of carers.en
dc.subjectEmployment -- Labour force participationen
dc.subjectChild Careen
dc.titleThe effect of unpaid caregiving intensity on labour force participation: results from a multinomial endogenous treatment modelen
dc.typeJournal Articlesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.031en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953613005790en
dc.identifier.surveyHILDAen
dc.description.keywordsInstrumental variablesen
dc.description.keywordsLabour force participationen
dc.description.keywordsAustraliaen
dc.description.keywordsInformal careen
dc.description.keywordsMultinomial endogenous treatmenten
dc.identifier.journalSocial Science & Medicineen
dc.identifier.volume100en
dc.description.pages115-122en
local.identifier.id5002en
dc.description.additionalinfoThis paper uses HILDA dataen
dc.title.bookSocial Science & Medicineen
dc.subject.dssLabour marketen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryChild Careen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryEmploymenten
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryLabour force participationen
dc.subject.flosseEmployment and unemploymenten
dc.relation.surveyBNLAen
dc.relation.surveyHILDAen
dc.old.surveyvalueBNLAen
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Articles-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

80
checked on Mar 28, 2024
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.