Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18309
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDockery, A.M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-13T03:42:58Zen
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-12T02:22:57Zen
dc.date.available2017-01-12T02:22:57Zen
dc.date.issued2016-10-27-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/18309en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10620/4290en
dc.description.abstractHow effectively different schools prepare young people for future social and economic engagement has important implications for education practice, funding allocations and social equity, as well as for parental decision making. This paper uses data from waves 2001-2014 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey to analyse the returns to having attended a Catholic or Independent private school as opposed to a government school. Based on wage equations estimated by random-effects panel models, Australians who attended Catholic schools are observed to enjoy an hourly wage premium of around 10 per cent, and other private schools a premium of around 15 per cent relative to those who went to a government school. Just over half of this premium can be accounted for by the greater level of educational attainment students ultimately achieve in the case of Catholic schools; and around three-quarters in the case of private schools. Cohort analysis shows these premiums have remained relatively stable over time, despite rising levels of Year 12 completion and higher education participation. Overall the results suggest that private schooling continues to be an important mechanism by which socio-economic advantage is transmitted between Australian generations, largely due to enhanced access to higher education. The extent to which this is a ‘causal’ effect of differential school quality remains contentious.en
dc.publisherNational Centre for Student Equity in Higher Educationen
dc.subjectChildren -- School ageen
dc.subjectEducation and Training -- Secondaryen
dc.subjectEducation and Training -- Costsen
dc.subjectEducation and Training -- Access and equityen
dc.titleDoes Private Schooling Pay? Evidence and Equity Implications for Australiaen
dc.typeReports and technical papersen
dc.identifier.urlhttps://bcec.edu.au/publications/private-schooling-pay-evidence-equity-implications-australia/#:~:text=Overall%20the%20results%20suggest%20that,differential%20school%20quality%20remains%20contentious.en
dc.identifier.surveyHILDAen
dc.description.institutionNational Centre for Student Equity in Higher Educationen
dc.title.reportResearch Reporten
dc.description.keywordssocioeconomic statusen
dc.description.keywordswagesen
dc.description.keywordsEducationen
dc.description.keywordsgovernment schoolsen
dc.description.keywordsprivate schoolsen
dc.description.pages26en
local.identifier.id4800en
dc.publisher.cityPerthen
dc.subject.dssLearning, education and trainingen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryChildrenen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryEducation and Trainingen
dc.subject.dsssubcategorySchool ageen
dc.subject.dsssubcategorySecondaryen
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryCostsen
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryAccess and equityen
dc.subject.flosseLearning, education and trainingen
dc.relation.surveyHILDAen
dc.old.surveyvalueHILDAen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeReports and technical papers-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Reports
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

322
checked on Dec 23, 2024
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.