Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10620/17945
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wooden, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Watson, N | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-13T03:39:43Z | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-28T02:31:53Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-28T02:31:53Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2002-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10620/17945 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10620/3949 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The quality of data generated by any survey is a function of three main elements. These are: (i) the representativeness of the sample; (ii) the completeness of responses (i.e., the extent to which there is missing data, or item-non-response); and (iii) the accuracy of the data (which in turn is a function of the questionnaire design, the accuracy of the responses provided, and the accuracy with which responses are recorded, coded and entered into the database). In addition, for the HILDA Survey, added concerns arise as a result of the need to match data, both across individuals within the same households and within individuals. This is a consequence of both the presence of multiple instruments and the desire to construct household-level variables. This paper provides an assessment of the data obtained for the first wave of the HILDA Survey (conducted in 2001) against each of these criteria. | en |
dc.publisher | Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research | en |
dc.subject | Surveys and Survey Methodology -- Dataset cleaning and development | en |
dc.subject | Surveys and Survey Methodology -- Questionnaire development | en |
dc.subject.classification | Surveys and Survey Methodology | en |
dc.title | Assessing the Quality of the HILDA Survey Wave 1 Data | en |
dc.type | Reports and technical papers | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/assets/documents/hilda-bibliography/hilda-technical-papers/htec402.pdf | en |
dc.identifier.survey | HILDA | en |
dc.description.institution | Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research | en |
dc.title.report | HILDA Project Technical Paper Series | en |
dc.description.keywords | match quality | en |
dc.description.keywords | data collection | en |
dc.description.keywords | questionnaire design | en |
dc.description.keywords | missing data | en |
dc.description.keywords | attrition bias | en |
dc.description.pages | 40 | en |
dc.title.series | HILDA Project Technical Paper Series | en |
local.identifier.id | 4418 | en |
dc.publisher.city | Melbourne | en |
dc.subject.dss | Surveys and survey methodology | en |
dc.subject.dssmaincategory | Surveys and Survey Methodology | en |
dc.subject.dsssubcategory | Dataset cleaning and development | en |
dc.subject.dsssubcategory | Questionnaire development | en |
dc.subject.flosse | Surveys and Survey Methodology | en |
dc.relation.survey | HILDA | en |
dc.old.surveyvalue | HILDA | en |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.openairetype | Reports and technical papers | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | Reports |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.