Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10620/17734
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Azpitarte, Francisco | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-13T03:37:46Z | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-17T03:12:03Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-17T03:12:03Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2013-07-20 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10620/17734 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10620/3845 | en |
dc.description.abstract | We investigate the pro-poorness of Australia’s strong economic growth in the first decade of the twenty-first century using anonymous and non-anonymous approaches to the measurement of pro-poor growth. The sensitivity of pro-poor growth evaluations to the definition of poverty is evaluated by comparing the results for the standard income-poverty measure with those based on a multidimensional definition of poverty. We find that Australian growth in this period can be only categorized as pro-poor according to the weakest concept of pro-poorness that does not require any bias of growth towards the poor. In addition, our results indicate that growth was clearly more pro-income poor than pro-multidimensionally poor. Counterfactual distribution analysis reveals that differences in the distribution of health between these two groups is the non-income factor that most contributes to explain this result. | en |
dc.subject | Health | en |
dc.subject | Income & Finance -- Poverty and disadvantage | en |
dc.title | Was Economic Growth in Australia Good for the Income-Poor? and for the Multidimensionally Poor? | en |
dc.type | Journal Articles | en |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2012-278.pdf | en |
dc.identifier.survey | HILDA | en |
dc.description.institution | Society for the Study of Economic Inequality | en |
dc.description.keywords | Pro-poorness | en |
dc.description.keywords | Growth | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Social Indicators Research | en |
dc.identifier.volume | DOI 10.1007/s11205-013-0378-8 | en |
dc.title.series | ECINEQ Working Paper Series | en |
local.identifier.id | 4298 | en |
dc.description.additionalinfo | Paper no. 2012-278 | en |
dc.subject.dss | Health and wellbeing | en |
dc.subject.dss | Income, wealth and finances | en |
dc.subject.dssmaincategory | Health | en |
dc.subject.dssmaincategory | Income & Finance | en |
dc.subject.dsssubcategory | Poverty and disadvantage | en |
dc.subject.flosse | Health and wellbeing | en |
dc.subject.flosse | Income, wealth and finances | en |
dc.relation.survey | HILDA | en |
dc.old.surveyvalue | HILDA | en |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Articles | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | Reports |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.