Caretaker notice. Before an election, the Australian Government assumes a caretaker role. Limited updates will be made to this site in line with the Guidance on Caretaker Conventions.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10620/17524
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Watson, N | en |
dc.contributor.author | Wilkins, R | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-13T03:35:56Z | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-19T02:20:39Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-19T02:20:39Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2012-02 | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | ISSN 1328-4991 (Print) - ISSN 1447-5863 (Online) - ISBN 978-0-7340-4266-8 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10620/17524 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10620/3624 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Most large-scale ongoing face-to-face surveys which began using pen and paper interviewing (PAPI) face an eventual shift to computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). In preparation for such a shift in the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, a trial of the CAPI collection mode was undertaken in the 2007 test sample. This involved a split-sample test of 764 households, where interviewers rather than households were randomly assigned to the PAPI or CAPI mode. This paper reports on the findings of this split sample test, both in terms of the fieldwork operations and the quality of the data collected. Apart from some concerns about the length of the interview, few differences were identified in the data collected by the two modes. Where CAPI differed from PAPI, it was generally in the direction thought to enhance data quality rather than reduce it. | en |
dc.subject | Surveys and Survey Methodology -- Fieldwork | en |
dc.subject.classification | Surveys and Survey Methodology | en |
dc.title | Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series No. 6/12 - Experimental Change from Paper-Based Interviewing to Computer-Assisted Interviewing in the HILDA Survey | en |
dc.type | Reports and technical papers | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/downloads/working-paper-series/old-wp/2012/wp2012n06.pdf | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/downloads/working-paper-series/old-wp/2012/wp2012n06.pdf | en |
dc.identifier.survey | HILDA | en |
dc.description.institution | Melbourne Institute of Applied Economics and Social Research | en |
dc.title.report | Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series | en |
dc.identifier.ris | http://flosse.dss.gov.au//ris.php?id=3971 | en |
dc.description.keywords | Mode evaluation | en |
dc.description.keywords | Random split-sample | en |
dc.description.keywords | Computer-assisted methods | en |
dc.description.keywords | Data quality | en |
dc.description.pages | 32 | en |
local.identifier.id | 3971 | en |
dc.identifier.edition | Working Paper No 6/12 | en |
dc.publisher.city | Melbourne | en |
dc.subject.dss | Surveys and survey methodology | en |
dc.subject.dssmaincategory | Surveys and Survey Methodology | en |
dc.subject.dsssubcategory | Fieldwork | en |
dc.subject.flosse | Surveys and Survey Methodology | en |
dc.relation.survey | HILDA | en |
dc.old.surveyvalue | HILDA | en |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairetype | Reports and technical papers | - |
Appears in Collections: | Reports |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.