Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/17524
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Nen
dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Ren
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-13T03:35:56Zen
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-19T02:20:39Zen
dc.date.available2012-03-19T02:20:39Zen
dc.date.issued2012-02en
dc.identifier.isbnISSN 1328-4991 (Print) - ISSN 1447-5863 (Online) - ISBN 978-0-7340-4266-8en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/17524en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10620/3624en
dc.description.abstractMost large-scale ongoing face-to-face surveys which began using pen and paper interviewing (PAPI) face an eventual shift to computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). In preparation for such a shift in the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, a trial of the CAPI collection mode was undertaken in the 2007 test sample. This involved a split-sample test of 764 households, where interviewers rather than households were randomly assigned to the PAPI or CAPI mode. This paper reports on the findings of this split sample test, both in terms of the fieldwork operations and the quality of the data collected. Apart from some concerns about the length of the interview, few differences were identified in the data collected by the two modes. Where CAPI differed from PAPI, it was generally in the direction thought to enhance data quality rather than reduce it.en
dc.subjectSurveys and Survey Methodology -- Fieldworken
dc.subject.classificationSurveys and Survey Methodologyen
dc.titleMelbourne Institute Working Paper Series No. 6/12en
dc.typeReports and technical papersen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.melbourneinstitute.com/miaesr/publications/working-paper-series/wps2012.htmlen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.melbourneinstitute.com/downloads/working_paper_series/wp2012n06.pdfen
dc.identifier.surveyHILDAen
dc.description.institutionMelbourne Institute of Applied Economics and Social Researchen
dc.title.reportMelbourne Institute Working Paper Seriesen
dc.identifier.rishttp://flosse.dss.gov.au//ris.php?id=3971en
dc.description.keywordsMode evaluationen
dc.description.keywordsRandom split-sampleen
dc.description.keywordsComputer-assisted methodsen
dc.description.keywordsData qualityen
dc.description.pages32en
local.identifier.id3971en
dc.identifier.editionWorking Paper No 6/12en
dc.publisher.cityMelbourneen
dc.subject.dssSurveys and survey methodologyen
dc.subject.dssmaincategorySurveys and Survey Methodologyen
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryFieldworken
dc.subject.flosseSurveys and Survey Methodologyen
dc.relation.surveyHILDAen
dc.old.surveyvalueHILDAen
item.openairetypeReports and technical papers-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Reports
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2,014
checked on Feb 23, 2024
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.