Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Longitudinal Study: HILDA
Title: The Effect of Work Status and Working Conditions on Mental Health in Four OECD Countries
Authors: Llena-Nozal, A 
Publication Date: Jul-2009
Pages: 15
Keywords: Employment
Mental Health
Abstract: This study aims to assess empirically whether being employed or returning to work is beneficial for all in terms of mental health, especially for those who already suffer from a longstanding illness or disability. We use longitudinal surveys from Australia, Canada, Switzerland and the UK to estimate panel data models that link decisions regarding labour market choices to health developments. To allow for state dependence of mental health, a dynamic panel model is used. The longitudinal analysis shows that non-employment generally is worse for mental health than working. The mental-health payoff to employment varies depending on the type of employment contract and working conditions. In particular, the mental health benefits for inactive individuals who obtain a non-standard job appear to be smaller than for those moving into standard employment arrangements, even after controlling for pre-existing mental health problems
Keywords: Surveys and Survey Methodology -- Survey comparison
Research collection: Journal Articles
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Sep 30, 2023
Google icon

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.