Caretaker notice. Before an election, the Australian Government assumes a caretaker role. Limited updates will be made to this site in line with the Guidance on Caretaker Conventions.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/17179
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCobb-Clark, D-
dc.contributor.authorHildebrand, V. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-13T03:33:05Zen
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-21T02:12:23Zen
dc.date.available2011-04-21T02:12:23Zen
dc.date.issued2009-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/17179en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10620/3255en
dc.description.abstractIs there evidence that households adjust their asset portfolios just prior to retirement in response to a means-tested public pension? We address this question by estimating a system of asset equations constrained to add up to net worth. We find little evidence that in 2006 healthy households or couples responded to the incentives embedded in the means test determining pension eligibility by reallocating their assets. While there are some significant differences in asset portfolios associated with being near the income threshold, being of pensionable age, and being in poor health these differences are often only marginally significant, are not robust across time, and are not clearly consistent with the incentives inherent in the pension eligibility rules. In 2006, any behavioral response to the means test seems to occur among single pensioners in poor health. Comparison with 2002 results suggests the incentives to reallocate assets may have weakened over time.en
dc.subjectFinance -- Financial Management (inc Budgeting)en
dc.subjectFinanceen
dc.subjectBenefits and Payments -- Income supporten
dc.subjectBenefits and Paymentsen
dc.titlePortfolio Allocation in the Face of a Means-Tested Public Pensionen
dc.typeReports and technical papersen
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.iza.org/publications/dp/4481/portfolio-allocation-in-the-face-of-a-means-tested-public-pensionen
dc.identifier.surveyHILDAen
dc.description.urlhttps://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/hildaen
dc.description.institutionIZAen
dc.title.reportIZA Discussion Paperen
dc.identifier.rishttp://flosse.dss.gov.au//ris.php?id=3511en
dc.description.keywordsmeans testingen
dc.description.keywordspublic pensionen
dc.description.keywordshousehold wealthen
dc.description.keywordsasset portfoliosen
dc.description.pages39en
dc.title.seriesIZA Discussion Papersen
local.identifier.id3511en
dc.identifier.edition4481en
dc.description.additionalinfoPaper No. 4481en
dc.subject.dssIncome, wealth and financesen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryBenefits and Paymentsen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryFinanceen
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryIncome supporten
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryFinancial Management (inc Budgeting)en
dc.subject.flosseIncome, wealth and financesen
dc.relation.surveyHILDAen
dc.old.surveyvalueHILDAen
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeReports and technical papers-
Appears in Collections:Reports
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,942
checked on May 12, 2025
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.