Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Longitudinal Study:||HILDA||Title:||Labour Underutilisation and Gender: Unemployment Versus Hidden-Unemployment||Authors:||Mitchell, W
|Publication Date:||Dec-2010||Pages:||233-248||Keywords:||Labour underutilisation
|Abstract:||As labour markets have become more complex there has been increasing interest among researchers in understanding the ways that social and labour market processes and contexts impact on various labour market states. One important area has been in understanding the differences between unemployment and hidden unemployment. This paper considers the ways in which these two labour market states differ for a sample of male and female respondents to the Household Income and Labour Dynamics Australia (HILDA) survey. It presents data related to the reasons why respondents in these two labour force states consider they are jobless and analyses the characteristics of male and female respondents in the two labour market states to consider differences in outcomes. The findings suggest that there are differences in the two states of labour market outcomes and that these are further complicated when one considers processes for males and females.||DOI:||10.1007/s11113-009-9137-6||URL:||https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11113-009-9137-6||Keywords:||Employment -- Underemployment; Gender; Employment -- Unemployment; Employment||Research collection:||Journal Articles|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Articles|
Show full item record
checked on Mar 28, 2023
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.