Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18622
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDobrescu, Loretti-
dc.contributor.authorShanker, Akshay-
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Hazel-
dc.contributor.authorNewell, Ben Rhodri-
dc.contributor.authorThorp, Susan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-01T02:16:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-01T02:16:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/18622-
dc.description.abstractHow do people save across their portfolio of assets in a lifetime? Using a dynamic lifecycle model of saving and portfolio choice featuring risky labor income, housing, and safe and risky financial assets inside and outside pension plans with comprehensive choice architecture, we examine the behavior of members of an industry-wide retirement fund to assess how standard saving motives, pension defaults, investment returns, preferences and frictions interact to drive lifetime savings across major asset classes. Our results show considerable heterogeneity in what motivates people how to save. First, we find that financial and housing assets are largely driven by consumption smoothing motives. While these motives also affect plan choices, their role in pension accumulation is more limited due to default switching costs. Removing such costs, on the other hand, encourages pension savings at the expense of financial wealth but not of housing. In fact, we find higher pension assets to drive up housing wealth throughout the lifecycle, as people - anticipating a wealthier retirement and to avoid potentially larger adjustment costs later in life - lock in higher housing investments early on. Second, being luxury goods, bequest motives lead to higher DC take-up and riskier portfolios, but only to a modest mid-life financial savings boost. Third, precautionary savings that insure against wage risks have similar plan effects to bequests, although they do not translate in any wealth dynamic. Finally, removing costless redraws on mortgages leads to higher financial savings, again displacing pension balances considerably more than housing wealth.en
dc.titleRetirement Eggs and Retirement Basketsen
dc.typeBooksen
dc.identifier.urlhttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4069226en
local.contributor.institutionUNSW Australia Business School, School of Economicsen
local.contributor.institutionUniversity of New South Walesen
local.contributor.institutionUNSW Sydney, CEPARen
local.contributor.institutionIndependenten
local.contributor.institutionThe University of Sydney Business Schoolen
dc.identifier.surveyHILDAen
dc.description.institutionUNSW Business Schoolen
dc.description.keywordslifetime savingsen
dc.description.keywordsportfolio choiceen
dc.description.keywordsincome risken
dc.description.keywordsdefaultsen
dc.description.keywordsmethod of momentsen
local.identifier.emaildobrescu@unsw.edu.auen
dc.subject.dssIncome, wealth and financesen
dc.relation.surveyHILDAen
item.openairetypeBooks-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Reports
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP2022_07_DSBNT_2022.pdf1.71 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

114
checked on Dec 6, 2023

Download(s)

82
checked on Dec 6, 2023
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.