Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Longitudinal Study: HILDA
Title: Contingent employment and labour market pathways: bridges or traps?
Authors: McVicar, Duncan 
Wooden, Mark 
Lass, Inga
Publication Date: Feb-2019
Pages: 18
Keywords: Precarious employment
Casual employment
Labour market pathways
Abstract: The debate over whether contingent (and typically more precarious) employment acts as a bridge to permanent employment, or as a trap, has tended to focus on transitions rather than longer-run pathways. This approach cannot accurately identify indirect pathways from contingent to permanent employment or ‘trap’ pathways involving short spells in other states. It also fails to distinguish between those experiencing contingent employment as a ‘blip’ and those with longer spells. This article employs a different approach involving sequence analysis. Exploiting longitudinal data for Australia, evidence for the co-existence of pathways that correspond to ‘bridge’ and ‘trap’ characterizations of contingent employment is found. Further, in the case of casual employment—the most common form of contingent employment in Australia—these two types of labour market pathways are roughly equally prevalent, although for women and those with low educational attainment ‘traps’ are more likely than ‘bridges'.
DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcy045
Research collection: Journal Articles
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Apr 1, 2023
Google icon

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.