Working Time Mismatch and Subjective Well-Being
Survey
HILDA
Date Issued
2007-11
Pages
36
Abstract
This study uses nationally representative panel survey data for Australia to identify the role
played by mismatches between hours actually worked and working time preferences in
contributing to reported levels of job and life satisfaction. Three main conclusions emerge.
First, it is not the number of hours worked that matters for subjective well-being, but working
time mismatch. Second, overemployment is a more serious problem than is
underemployment. Third, while the magnitude of the impact of overemployment may seem
small in absolute terms, relative to other variables, such as disability, the effect is quite large.
played by mismatches between hours actually worked and working time preferences in
contributing to reported levels of job and life satisfaction. Three main conclusions emerge.
First, it is not the number of hours worked that matters for subjective well-being, but working
time mismatch. Second, overemployment is a more serious problem than is
underemployment. Third, while the magnitude of the impact of overemployment may seem
small in absolute terms, relative to other variables, such as disability, the effect is quite large.
External resource (Link)
ISBN
ISSN 1328-4991 (Print) ISSN 1447-5863 (Online) ISBN 978-0-7340-3262-1
Type
Reports and technical papers
