Can Immigrants Insure against Shocks as Well as the Native-born?
Survey
HILDA
Date Issued
2016-07
Publisher
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Pages
24
Keywords
job loss
labour supply
disability
consumption
income
Abstract
The impact that an unforeseen event has on household welfare depends on the extent to
which household members can take actions to mitigate the direct impact of the shock. In this paper, we use nine years of longitudinal data from the Household Income Labour Dynamics of Australia (HILDA) survey to examine the impact of job displacement and serious health problems on: individual labour supply and incomes, household incomes and food expenditure. We extend on the previous literature by examining whether mitigation strategies and their effectiveness differs for the native-born and immigrants. Immigrants make up nearly
one-quarter of the Australian population and there are a number of reasons to suspect that they may be less able to mitigate adverse shocks than the native-born.
which household members can take actions to mitigate the direct impact of the shock. In this paper, we use nine years of longitudinal data from the Household Income Labour Dynamics of Australia (HILDA) survey to examine the impact of job displacement and serious health problems on: individual labour supply and incomes, household incomes and food expenditure. We extend on the previous literature by examining whether mitigation strategies and their effectiveness differs for the native-born and immigrants. Immigrants make up nearly
one-quarter of the Australian population and there are a number of reasons to suspect that they may be less able to mitigate adverse shocks than the native-born.
External resource (Link)
Subjects
Subject Keywords
DSS Main category
DSS Sub-category
Type
Reports and technical papers
