Risk factors for suicide among rural men: are farmers more socially isolated?
Survey
HILDA
Author(s)
Date Issued
2013-11
Pages
11
Keywords
Occupation
Abstract
Purpose – International evidence demonstrates elevated suicide rates among farming occupations,
relative to other occupations. A psychosocial factor commonly argued to contribute to farmer suicide is
social isolation and lack of social support, which in turn may indicate a need for policies and programs
to support farmers’ social participation and connectedness with others. However, there has been very
little empirical investigation of perceived levels of social connectedness and social participation among
farmers. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach – This study used a cross-section of a nationally representative
dataset, the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. This enabled
quantification of Australian farmers’ self-reported levels of social connectedness and social
participation, relative to rural adult males in other occupations.
Findings – Levels of perceived social support and social participation among farmers were
approximately equivalent to social support and social participation among rural men in other
occupations.
Research limitations/implications – Possible mediating variables, such as influences of social
support on mental health, were not examined in this study. However, these findings nonetheless
suggest the assumption that social isolation is higher among farmers requires careful consideration.
Originality/value – This is the first study that quantifies social support and social participation
among farmers, using a comparative approach.
relative to other occupations. A psychosocial factor commonly argued to contribute to farmer suicide is
social isolation and lack of social support, which in turn may indicate a need for policies and programs
to support farmers’ social participation and connectedness with others. However, there has been very
little empirical investigation of perceived levels of social connectedness and social participation among
farmers. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach – This study used a cross-section of a nationally representative
dataset, the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. This enabled
quantification of Australian farmers’ self-reported levels of social connectedness and social
participation, relative to rural adult males in other occupations.
Findings – Levels of perceived social support and social participation among farmers were
approximately equivalent to social support and social participation among rural men in other
occupations.
Research limitations/implications – Possible mediating variables, such as influences of social
support on mental health, were not examined in this study. However, these findings nonetheless
suggest the assumption that social isolation is higher among farmers requires careful consideration.
Originality/value – This is the first study that quantifies social support and social participation
among farmers, using a comparative approach.
Type
Journal Articles
