The effect of lockdowns on mental health: evidence from a natural experiment analysing an Australian longitudinal probability sample survey
Survey
HILDA
Author(s)
Trinh, Trong-Anh
Trong-Anh.Trinh@monash.edu
Monash University
Vera-Toscano, Esperanza
e.veratoscano@unimelb.edu.au
University of Melbourne
Date Issued
2022-05-01
Pages
e427-e436
Keywords
Mental health
Covid-19
Lockdowns
Abstract
Background. Many studies have examined population mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic but have not been able to isolate the direct effect of lockdowns. Australia provides a rare opportunity to examine lockdown effects because its aggressive suppression policy response to COVID-19 enables disentangling the introduction of lockdowns from high rates of community transmission.
Methods. Difference-in-difference models were estimated that compared changes in mental health of those exposed to lockdown with those not exposed. Mental health was assessed using the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). The analysis was possible because of the coincidence of annual national longitudinal survey data collection during 2020 with a natural experiment, with residents in one part of Australia (Victoria) exposed to lockdown and those living elsewhere relatively free of restrictions.
Outcomes. A significant, but relatively small, treatment effect of the lockdown on MHI-5 was found (-1·4 points: 95% CI -1·7 to 1·2). The treatment effect was larger for females ( 2·2: 2·6 to 1·7) and even larger for coupled females with dependent children ( 4·4: -5·0 to -3·8) and for females without access to personal outdoor space at home ( 4·2: 5·5 to 2·9). Treatments effects were generally small for males ( 0·7: 0·8 to 0·5).
Interpretation. The imposition of lockdowns had a modest negative effect on overall population mental health. The mental health burden of lockdowns was not, however, felt equally by all groups.
Methods. Difference-in-difference models were estimated that compared changes in mental health of those exposed to lockdown with those not exposed. Mental health was assessed using the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). The analysis was possible because of the coincidence of annual national longitudinal survey data collection during 2020 with a natural experiment, with residents in one part of Australia (Victoria) exposed to lockdown and those living elsewhere relatively free of restrictions.
Outcomes. A significant, but relatively small, treatment effect of the lockdown on MHI-5 was found (-1·4 points: 95% CI -1·7 to 1·2). The treatment effect was larger for females ( 2·2: 2·6 to 1·7) and even larger for coupled females with dependent children ( 4·4: -5·0 to -3·8) and for females without access to personal outdoor space at home ( 4·2: 5·5 to 2·9). Treatments effects were generally small for males ( 0·7: 0·8 to 0·5).
Interpretation. The imposition of lockdowns had a modest negative effect on overall population mental health. The mental health burden of lockdowns was not, however, felt equally by all groups.
URI (Link)
External resource (Link)
Type
Journal Articles
